Don’t mess with Medicare!

PrexistingOverhaul Medicare? Restructure Medicaid? Not so fast, say those who receive medical care via those agencies.

In the wake of legislative stirrings about changing these signature government health organizations, the Kaiser Family Foundation asked members of the public what their preferences were: Keep the programs as they are, or tinker with them in hopes of improving their services?

Seven out of 10 said, “Don’t mess with Medicare benefits!” Another 26 percent favored revisiting the benefits package so that seniors would receive a fixed contribution toward the cost of health insurance. Apparently the other 4 percent lived in caves and didn’t know what the Kaiser folks were talking about.

The poll also showed strong public opposition (62 percent opposed) to altering the Medicaid format by converting it to a state block grant model. Another 32 percent favored the switch, and the final 6 percent just shrugged.

The support for Medicare in particular crossed political party lines, while Republicans much more strongly favored the Medicaid block grant proposal than did Democrats.

One change to Medicare that most respondents did support: letting the government negotiate Medicare prescription drug prices. On that question, 87 percent said “Yes, go for it!”

A slight majority — 58 percent — also favored increasing premiums for wealthy Medicare users, and 51 percent said they felt Medicare Advantage plan payments should be reduced.

Far fewer favored raising the eligibility age from 65 to 67 (39 percent), raising premiums for all beneficiaries (31 percent), or increasing cost-sharing (24 percent).

Looking to the future, however, these respondents were realists. More than two-thirds (68 percent) said some changes will be necessary if Medicare is to be sustainable going forward.

Posted in robertjrussell | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Pending Home Sales

Pending sales slid in May, first y-o-y decline in 2 years
Pending home sales were lower in May following three months of gains and posted the first year-over-year decline for 2 years.

The National Association of Realtors’ index was down 3.7 per cent to 110.8 in May from a downwardly revised 115 in April and was 0.2 per cent lower than in May 2015.

The index is at its 3rd highest reading of the year though, and NAR chief economist Lawrence Yun says that buyers are increasingly frustrated by a lack of supply and the tense competition that has created.
“Total housing inventory at the end of each month has remarkably decreased year-over-year now for an entire year,” Yun said. “There are simply not enough homes coming onto the market to catch up with demand and to keep prices more in line with inflation and wage growth.”

Yun sees potentially lower mortgage rates in the short-term due to market fluctuations post-Brexit. However, there could also be increased demand from foreign investors in US real estate.

99 out of 100 for improving metros
Freddie Mac’s Multi-Indicator Market Index reveals that 99 out of the 100 top metros in the US have improved housing markets year-over-year.

The national picture is still showing that most areas are outside their historic benchmark levels but 36 out of the 50 states plus DC are within range of those levels as are 67 of the 100 metro areas.
Month-over-month the most improved areas were Mississippi, Tennessee, Massachusetts, Florida and Nebraska.

In April, 42 of the 50 states and 86 of the top 100 metros were showing an improving three-month trend. The same time last year, 46 of the 50 states, and all of the top 100 metro areas were showing an improving three-month trend.

Mortgage applications lower
Mortgage applications were down 2.6 per cent in the week ending June 24 according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s market composite index. On an unadjusted basis, they were 3 per cent lower.
The refinance index was down 2 per cent with the purchase index down 3 per cent (SAAR) and 4 per cent unadjusted. The refinance share of applications was up slightly to 58.1 per cent (from 57.7 per cent a week earlier.)

Posted in real estate | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

How Obesity Affects Insurance in most states

Obesity is driving up health care costs. Here are the top 10 states with the highest percentage of obese residents. (Photo: iStock)

As America attempts to get a handle on its obesity dilemma, knowing where to focus resources will be a key part of the strategy.

A joint survey by Gallup and Healthways of obesity rates by state suggests that the populace of certain regions and states should be given a high priority.

The survey compared obesity rates not only state to state, but also longitudinally, going back to the initial survey in 2008 to spot trends.

Gallup examines which states have the lowest percentage of obese residents. Where does your home state land?

What they survey shows is that the national obesity rate continues to climb, from 25.5 percent in 2008 to 28 percent in 2015.

Significant regional trends were also spotted. The rate is growing faster in the Midwest and South than in the Northeast and West, and in a sense, the nation is starting to divide along an obesity line.

The Midwest, where the rate is the highest, increased the most since 2008, by 3.2 percent to hit 30 percent last year. The West, meanwhile, which boasts the lowest rate now and historically, increased 1.8 percent since 2008 — and is now 5.4 percent lower than the rate in the Midwest. The Southern rate trails the Midwest by a mere .1 percent, and its rate has also been growing much faster (2.9 percent) than either than of the West or the Northeast (2 percent).

The surveyors said the cost that Americans pay for this trend is escalating right along with the obesity rate.

“Given that obesity is associated with illnesses such as heart disease, diabetes, stroke, osteoarthritis and some forms of cancer, the medical costs for an obese person amounted to $1,429 more per year than for a person of a normal weight, according to research conducted in 2008 by RTI International and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. After adjusting for inflation, the annual medical costs for 2015 are $1,573 more for a person who is obese than for a person of a normal weight,” the survey reports.

Where should the battle against obesity be first launched? How about in the states with the highest rates, which are, as follows:

Barbecue ribs

Both South Carolina and Kentucky are known for their own popular styles of barbecue, which can make it hard to diet in the two states.

10. South Carolina and Kentucky (tie)

With 31.4 percent of their populations identifying as obese, these two gems of the South showed up in a dead heat in the last position. That said, South Carolina may have the larger challenge of the two. It also placed No. 8 on the list of states with the highest increases between 2008 and 2015 — a 3.8 percent hike. Kentucky did not make that list. Whew.

Lobster roll

While delicious, lobster rolls and clam chowder aren’t exactly healthy food staples. It’s no wonder that Maine, known for some of the best seafood in the country, is a top state with high obesity rates.

8. Michigan and Maine (tie)

Another tie, this time among a couple of northern states. Sadly, both states — standing at a 31.5 percent obesity rate —are experiencing rapid increases compared to where they stood in 2008. Maine tops the list of the fastest-growing rate, with a 6.6 percent increase, while Michigan anchors the No. 6 position on that list with a 4.8 percent increase.

Cincinnati chili

Yes, Cincinnati chili  a Mediterranean-spiced meat sauce for pasta and hot dogs — is a thing in Ohio and might be one reason behind its ranking on Gallup’s list.

6. Ohio

The Buckeye State represents a breaking point in this heaviest of the heavy list at 31.6 percent. There’s actually little difference between this first group — a matter of just .2 percent separating No. 10 from No. 6. After this, though, the numbers take a jump and, with one exception, they are all southern states.

Mike Huckabee

Mike Huckabee, who was governor of Arkansas from 1996 to 2007, has been very public in his battle with obesity. He once weighed as much as 300 pounds before he was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, which prompted him to change his diet and begin excercising. He has used his profile to become a crusader for good health.

5. Oklahoma and Arkansas (tie)

Such close neighbors, in so many ways, yet Oklahoma separates itself from the home of former President Clinton by placing No. 4 on the list of states with the greatest increases since 2008, at 5.5 percent. Arkansas does not appear on this list at all, so perhaps it’s going in the right direction. Still, both Oklahoma and Arkansas are in the top five of Gallup’s survey with a 33.5 percent obesity rating.

General Rochambeau

America’s forefathers probably didn’t anticipate one of the country’s most historical states to make the most obese list.

3. Delaware

Only five U.S. states have a smaller population than “The First State,” so nicknamed because its representative was the first of the original 13 states to sign the U.S. Constitution. So perhaps its rate (33.8 percent) can be more heavily influenced by the influx or outflow of just a handful of very heavy or very thin individuals. It is not on the list of states whose rates have increased the most since 2008.

Elvis

One of the state’s most recognized celebrities, Elvis Presley, famously struggled with weight problems before his death.

2. Mississippi

Gallup and Healthways offer estimates of the annual health care cost per 100 residents of obesity by state. Mississippi (35.5 percent) is No. 2 on this list, at $55.9 million. The estimated cost for all adults exceeds $1 billion. The only bright spot: It’s not on the list of states whose rates have increased the most since 2008.

Biscuits and apple butter

Apple butter is such a West Virginia staple that one weekend a year is dedicated to celebrate the sugary, spicy mixture.

1. West Virginia

The “Mountain State” faces substantial challenges if it hopes to give up its title as the most obese state in the country with 37 percent of its residents classified as obese. Not only is it statistically well ahead of Mississippi, but it ranks No. 2 (by .1 percent) on the list of states whose rates have increased the most since 2008, and No. 1 in terms of cost per 100 residents of obesity by state at $58.3 million. If those dedicated to reversing the obesity trend in America want a place to begin the search for the key, West Virginia would be a likely starting point.

Posted in Insurance | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Is Condo living for you?

When you buy a condo, you own it just as you would a single-family detached house. But living in a condo differs from living in a house in several ways. Here are a few distinctions to consider.

Shared Walls
Depending on where your condominium is situated in the complex, you may be sharing one or multiple walls with neighboring units. If you’re coming from a freestanding house, make sure you’re comfortable living close to your neighbors.

Condo Associations
With a condo, you pay homeowners association (HOA) fees to cover maintenance costs for the building and included amenities. The association also sets rules you’ll need to comply with regarding pets, noise levels, parking, remodeling and other matters. Because it’s a shared building, condo rules are generally more stringent and comprehensive than HOA rules for houses.

In addition to your monthly dues, condo associations may also impose special assessments to pay for unexpected repairs and maintenance. It’s important to buy into a well-run, well-funded association. Poor management may lead to poor upkeep, which could result in excessive fees.

Lower Maintenance
Some choose to buy a condo since there’s usually less upkeep than with a freestanding house. The association fees will often cover services like lawn care and building maintenance, costs that would otherwise fall on your shoulders should you opt for a house.

Which would suit you better — a condo or a house? There are certainly pros and cons to each, but giving some thought to your lifestyle and personal preferences can help you decide.

Posted in real estate | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Compare Quotes Pro.com New CEO

April 20, 2016 – CompareQuotesPro.com announces it’s new Chief Executive Officer today, Robert J Russell. Mr. Russell is also the owner of many Real Estate websites as well as numerous Insurance websites all over the world.
As final negotiations were completed, it was in CompareQuotesPro‘s best decision to name Robert J. Russell to lead the organization to keep up with ever developing technology as the Insurance Online platform emerges.
To find out about Robert J Russell – visit: http://www.CompareQuotesPro.com for more information.
Posted in Business | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Robert’s Recommended Movie of the Day

Blackway

An ex-logger comes to the aid of a woman who returns to her hometown in the Pacific Northwest and finds herself harassed and stalked by a former cop turned crime lord.

http://afdah.tv/embed/4061010

Posted in movie | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Your Real Estate website is collecting Dust not Leads

Olh_must-haves-effective-website

According to ListHub, 92 percent of home buyers start their search for a new home online. Are you giving consumers what they want with your business website? Not only is your website a great platform to display your brand and value, but it can also be a great lead capture tool. Making sure your website is up to today’s online standards will ensure you stand out when a consumer lands on your page. There are three best practices we think are most important for an effective real estate website:

Show Your Value

Consumers come to your website to search for listings and learn about the local market, so show them what you got! Your site should be designed with your potential clients in mind. Think about what information they’re looking for and how you can provide it in a user-friendly manner. Testimonials from previous customers are a great way to demonstrate your value and explain (in a more unbiased manner) how you can satisfy a consumer’s needs. Local market statistics, neighborhood reports, and community updates help to position you as a local expert.

Use a mix of text, photos, and videos to engage consumers visually – content they can easily share is a great way to get your name out to the masses and establish your place as a trusted source of local real estate information.

Posted in Business | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Wealth Transfer and How it Affects You

1. Too Much Joint Property. To some affluent individuals their “simple solution” to the transfer of their wealth is to have it all titled in joint name. This “simple solution” can cost hundreds and result in costly tax and non-tax problems when used excessively or by the wrong people.

At death, your property essentially will pass one of three ways: by title, by beneficiary designation or by your will. Joint property passes by title, meaning that it overrides your will. A surviving spouse can do whatever they want with the previously jointly owned property during life and ultimately leave it to anyone they wish at death, regardless of your desires. This can be a significant issue in second marriages.

When property is titled jointly, it does not escape taxation. In fact, when the transfer is made to someone other than a spouse, there is the potential to trigger gift taxes. Remember that the federal tax rates are called the Unified Gift and Estate Tax rates. That means that the taxes apply whether you transfer property while you’re living or after you’re gone. Transfers in excess of the Lifetime Exemption are taxed at different rates, depending on the value of the transfer.

Although the Lifetime Exemption, or Unified Credit, allows every individual to effectively transfer a certain amount of wealth free of federal estate taxes, too much jointly owned property will override this exemption. This mistake can cost over $210,000 in unnecessary taxes. Your clients need to review their property ownership today.

2. Leaving Everything to Your Spouse. Some people erroneously believe that this eliminates federal estate taxes due to the estate tax Unlimited Marital Deduction. Keep in mind, however, that this is merely a postponement of tax. It’s true that there is no tax at the first death, but at the second death, your assets will be piled on top of your spouse’s assets and taxed at the highest rate. As noted previously, you can save over $210,000 by establishing a trust at your death that will receive assets equal to your Lifetime Exemption. This trust, commonly called a Credit Shelter or Bypass Trust, provides income, and principal if needed, to them for life, but is not included in their taxable estate after they are gone.

The other issue here is a practical one: do they have the experience, or desire, to manage a large stock portfolio, real estate holdings or a family business? Does your client ever worry that their hard-earned family wealth could end up in the hands of Mr. or Mrs. Now-That-You’re-Gone, or their kids, and not ever make it to your children? They may consider a Beyond-The-Grave trust, called a Qualified Terminable Interest Property trust (QTIP for those who love acronyms). It would receive the property in excess of their Lifetime Exemption. It would pay income, and principal as needed, to their spouse for life, and then transfer to the predetermined people of your choice, i.e., your children.

3. Your Will is Not Your Will. A will is a legal document used by many to make their final wishes known: their wishes about who gets what they have after they’re gone. One man’s will said, “To my son I leave the pleasure of earning a living. For 28 years he thought that pleasure was mine, but he was mistaken.”

John Harvard, in his will, left his personal library and half of his estate to build a new college on one acre of ground, a cow yard. One of the most sought after prizes in the world was established by the will of the inventor of dynamite and nitroglycerin: Alfred Nobel. Cecil Rhodes, through his will, created the now famous scholarships that bear his name.

And yet, many die without a will in place. James Dean died at the age of 29 in a tragic car crash without a will. Not a surprise, but so did presidents Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Jackson, Ulysses Grant and James Garfield. Considered by some to have been the world’s leading expert on wills, Thomas Jarman, died without one.

Your clients may say “at least I have one,” But, when did they last take a look at it? Do they know what it says? More importantly, does it reflect their current wishes? I can’t tell you how many people are surprised to actually find out that their wills are not in line with their wishes. Major changes in their life should trigger a review.

And, you want to be sure that your will incorporates the latest tax law changes. Has your will been reviewed since the tax law changes of 1997? Second, consider another opinion. Most would not consider major surgery without a second opinion. Protecting your wealth deserves the same attention.

4. Improperly Owned Life Insurance. Who owns your clients life insurance? If the answer is them or their spouse, it could cost them up to 60 cents of every dollar of benefit. Owning the policy means that the proceeds are included in your clients taxable estate. No problem at their death if they’re married, but up to 60 percent can be lost unnecessarily at the death of the surviving spouse. They can establish a trust that will pay income and principal to their spouse as long as they live, but not be taxed when they are gone. Don’t forget about their group term insurance, unless they take steps to remove it from their taxable estate, it will also be included.

Often the wrong contingent owner results in unnecessary taxes. And, making the estate the beneficiary will subject the proceeds to the claims of creditors, unnecessary delays of probate, and in some states, state inheritance tax.

5. Equating Success in Wealth Accumulation with Success in Wealth Transfer. J.P. Morgan built the family fortunes into a colossal financial and industrial empire and formed the U.S. Steel Corp., the first billion-dollar corporation in the world. He also financed manufacturing and mining, and controlled banks, insurance companies, shipping lines and communications systems. A brilliant businessman, yet he lost 69 percent, over $12,000,000, to taxes and costs at his death.

Since it’s inception in 1913, the estate tax has too often succeeded in doing what it was instituted to do: to keep wealth from being transferred from one generation to the next. Just because your clients have accumulated wealth doesn’t necessarily mean that they’ll be able to transfer the majority of it.

6. Leaving Your Retirement Plans to Your Children. Retirement plan assets, when left to children, are subject to both the estate tax and an income tax called the Income in Respect of Decedent tax. What does that mean? Without proper planning, up to 76 percent of your clients’ retirement plan assets can be lost to taxes. Who’s the beneficiary of the bulk of your clients IRA, the IRS?

7. Lack of Liquidity. In the 1800s, George Sand remarked, “to have no cash means, absolute powerlessness.” In wealth transfer planning, no cash can be devastating. Particularly if your family wealth includes large real estate holdings or a business. Estate taxes can mean the loss of treasured family assets. Ask Joe Robbie’s family: they lost the Miami Dolphins and Joe Robbie Stadium due to the need for cash to pay estate taxes. In a recent survey among successors of successful family businesses whose businesses failed after they were passed on to the next generation, 97.9 percent had to sell the business to raise the cash to pay estate taxes.

Estate taxes must be paid in cash, usually within nine months, after you are gone. Most people do not structure their wealth with liquidity in mind. Therefore, assets have to be liquidated, regardless of whether it’s a good time to sell. A forced sale of an asset can result in not only the loss of the asset, but also a significant loss in value to your clients’ family due to the poor timing. In addition to federal estate taxes, the following can increase your clients family’s need for cash: state death taxes, generation skipping transfer taxes, federal income taxes, state income taxes, probate and administrative costs, debts, cash bequests, family cash needs, family business cash needs and any funds needed to complete the transfer of a family business.

8. Equally Inequitable. This often happens in an attempt to make distributions to heirs equal. However, “equal” is not always “equitable.” This is particularly true in a family business. Leaving control of the family business equally among siblings is a sure-fire recipe for business failure. Control, for decision making purposes, can be placed in the hands of the most qualified heir; while value, the worth of the business, can be shared equally by all heirs.

9. Believing That Everyone Must Pay Taxes. Transfer taxes are voluntary! “The fact that any substantial amount of tax is now being collected can only be attributed to taxpayer indifference to avoidance opportunities or a lack of aggressiveness on the part of estate planners.” That was written by Columbia law professor, George Cooper, in his book, A Voluntary Tax? For a century, families like the DuPonts, the Kennedys and the Fords have passed large sums of money without taxes, through means available to us all. John Rockefeller, Jr., at his death, lost only 16 percent to taxes and his son avoided estate taxes altogether.

It is the right of every American to do whatever they can to avoid taxes. Judge Learned Hand wrote, “Anyone may so arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes.” If your clients’ current plan has them paying taxes when they’re gone, they have not explored all their options.

10. No Integrated Game Plan. “The good is the enemy of the best!” Or, as Goethe said, “Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of things which matter least.” What’s this have to do with planning the transfer of your clients’ wealth? Everything. It’s about priorities, about making the right decisions, about choosing the “best” course of action. But how do you do that, you ask. By beginning with, as Steven Covey puts it, the end in mind.

Think about the construction of a house. You begin with what kind of house you want, a clear picture of what it should look like. Then plans are formulated, a blueprint is prepared. All of this is done before one board is cut or one nail is driven. And, someone is put in charge of seeing that the project stays on track.

You wouldn’t just begin building one room here, and one room there, hoping that it all fits together. And yet, that’s the process that many are forced to use when it comes to the transfer of their wealth: one document here, one trust there. No integrated game plan, no sense of what it should look like when it’s done, no coordination, no one responsible for keeping it all on track. The results are often disastrous: extra costs, too much in taxes, details not completed and missed leveraging opportunities.

Posted in Insurance | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Global MLS

wav_google-zillow-brokerage

Real estate is not just an online thing. It’s a global thing. People buy houses all around the globe and, in many nations, the notion of online real estate is hot. In the city of Dallas, Texas, companies valued at 312 million or 40 million, like Housesimple along with easyProperty and eMoov, are all trying to make a go of it with significant venture backing. Online real estate is ripe for the taking.

Zillow Group will not need to go out for additional funding to pivot to online real estate. The company is valued at over $5B and is operating at a run rate of $703M. Their balance sheet shows $570 million in cash and cash equivalents.

Google has registered as a licensed mortgage broker in the US and is already working with Zillow to sell home loans. Google has $90 billion languishing in cash. Situating that cash in home mortgages is a way to put that money to work.

Zillow Knows the Consumer Better than Most Brokers

Want to know who owns what house? Zillow knows. Zillow launched an effort to acquire public records data years ago. But Zillow’s customer record goes beyond the public record. Zillow knows the home buyer and seller’s email address and phone number from a decade of consumers passing through their portal. They even know who the agent was that worked with them on their last transaction!

Posted in Business | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Retirement Plans at Work

Employees in the health care sector are challenging — to retirement plan sponsors, providers, advisors and intermediaries.

That’s according to the research report “Retirement Plan Trends in Today’s Healthcare Market,” coauthored by Transamerica Retirement Solutions Corporation and the American Hospital Association.

It found that health care employees are far more likely than not to participate in a defined contribution plan, with more than 82 percent doing so.

In their efforts to satisfy employee needs, 80 percent of plan sponsors partner with an intermediary; that intermediary is most likely to be an investment or benefits consultant who also works either primarily or exclusively with retirement plans.

One trend that sponsors and their advisors might want to be aware of is the need to use mobile technology as a means to communicate with hospital workers on retirement education.

Being with patients instead of at computers means that these workers can be difficult to reach otherwise.

The report also said that sponsors are spending a lot of time worrying about the impact of rising healthcare costs on the plan, with 53 percent responding “extremely concerned” or “very concerned” when asked.

And 51 percent said another worry was that “employees may have to delay retirement because they are unprepared financially.”

Including Roths as options in 403(b) plans is a popular option, with 33 percent doing so — compared with just 21 percent last year.

Sponsors are also getting creative in their approaches, using both one-on-one and group employee meetings to reach employees.

They’re also using other strategies they see as effective in meeting plan challenges: offering attractive employer matching contributions and implementing automatic features.

Sponsors are also increasingly streamlining plan investment options as a means to push employees toward better retirement preparedness. The report identified what it called a “sweet spot” in the number of investment options, with an increasing number of plans adopting that range: 35 percent of plans offered 11–15 funds in 2015, up from 29 percent in 2014.

Posted in Retirement | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment