Will healthy retirees pay more for retirement?

How much should the cost of health care be factored into retirement savings rates?

That depends on what health conditions will have to be treated.

New research from Empower Retirement, the nation’s second largest retirement plan record keeper by number of participants, reveals what it calls counterintuitive data on what retirees need to budget for health care.

The Empower Institute, the research arm of the service provider, has created a proprietary formula that estimates specific health conditions and their correlating mortality risk with different investment return scenarios to help individuals ballpark a health care savings rate.

The Obama administration’s budget raises health spending to $1.1 trillion, according to a Washington Post analysis.

The good news is that a more specific savings strategy pegged to individuals’ health conditions can help better understand potential out-of-pocket costs, and that information can help plan participants better prepare for retirement.

The bad news? Being healthy isn’t cheap.

In fact, Empower’s data shows a healthy 65-year old male is going to need upwards of $144,000 to cover Medicare premiums and out-of-pocket costs in retirement.

That healthy 65-year old is in select company; previous Empower research projects that only one in five households is expected to be healthy as they enter retirement.

Those fortunate retirees face the prospect of increased lifespans and a subsequent need to save more to cover premium costs.

By comparison, a 65 year-old living with a cancer diagnosis at retirement will need less in savings for health care costs than if they were healthy—around $130,000.

And a diabetic entering retirement may only need around $88,000, given the limited life expectancy.

The key takeaway from the new research is that adverse health conditions don’t necessarily correlate with higher health care expenses–and that can present a challenge as to how health care costs are factored into pre-retirement savings rates.

“Conventional wisdom suggest that healthy retirees would enjoy lower overall healthcare expenses throughout retirement,” said W. Van Harlow, director of research for Empower Institute.

But “longer lifespan means continued Medicare premium payments,” said Harlow in a statement.

Harlow’s and Empower’s research incorporates data from HealthView Services’ estimates of mortality rates for specific health conditions.

A healthy 65-year old male can expect to live to be 87, compared to a recent retiree with a cancer diagnosis, who can expect to live to be 81. A newly retired diabetic has a life expectancy of 78.

To be clear, Empower’s research looks at the cost of out-of-pocket and Medicare premium costs—it does not consider ancillary services not covered by Medicare.

The study calculates those out-of-pocket costs for 65-year olds, accounting for gender and earnings, as higher earners pay surcharges on Medicare part B and D premiums. It then takes out-of-pocket costs at 65 and applies historic healthcare inflation rates to arrive at its estimates.

“To be sure, there is not—and actually cannot be—any one-size-fits-all solution to retiree health costs,” writes Harlow in the new paper, An Apple a Day: The impact of Health Conditions on the Required Savings for Healthcare.

Harlow’s research concedes that it is “nearly impossible to precisely predict a specific individual’s healthcare costs across what may be decades of retirement.”

But the impossibility of precision “is no excuse for inertia,” says Harlow.

“Doing nothing to address retiree health costs is not an option,” he writes.

Posted in Retirement | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Find a job you love

1) Self-assess: Finding a job you love involves knowing yourself and what you want. Do you have specific talents or skills that could be of use? How does your past job experience and education fit in? As you prioritize your needs and wants, you’ll have a much better idea of what jobs to apply for.

2) Stick to your guns: To avoid wasting time in your current search, stick with your list of “wants and needs.” It’s always better to hold out for the job you actually want. Don’t necessarily take the first offer you get. 3) Pursue your curiosity: Get to know the company and the job you’re applying to. Find out as much about the company and its culture as you can. Internships or information interviews are a great way to get a feel for a company’s culture, values and day-to-day functions.

4) Focus on a few companies you really like: Sometimes less is more. If you know the field you want to get a job in, do some research into companies that offer similar positions, benefits, culture, salary and career advancements. 5) Customize a killer cover letter: Make your cover letter reflect any unique traits you have to offer and what you want to accomplish in the position. Avoid using fluffy, vague or cliche statements. Instead, focus on helping the reader understand who you are and how you can succeed in the given job.

Posted in Business | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The story behind Zenefits

Is what Zenefits did really that different?

Porfirio Partida
Developer at Nearsoft

I understand that zenefits technically broke the law and has compliance failures. I don’t condone it, but why are people coming down so hard on them when other startups take the same tact – basically ignore the law until you’re big enough to get noticed – uber did it, youtube did it. I don’t think we can come down on some and others?

John Arroyo

John Arroyo Entrepreneur • Advisor
Develop Web Apps, eCommerce, and Advise Start Ups
It’s not just that they broke the law, they gave bad advice to companies and left some vulnerable to minor hr violations.

I used them for a couple years, they made a mess of our health coverage. Right as they were kicking off their health coverage the health care act (Obamacare) was taking effect and they were giving bad advice in some cases. Total amature hour stuff if you ask me…not a fake it till you make it scenario
Carey Martell

Carey Martell Entrepreneur
New Media Expert and Entrepeneur
They used unlicensed brokers to sell insurance, including health insurance. This is quite an order of magnitude different than users posting clips of SNL and Family Guy onto YouTube, or somebody giving you a ride downtown for $20. The kind of fraud that can occur without regulating insurance is pretty devastating to people’s lives.
Michael Brill
Michael Brill Entrepreneur
Building the first global direct marketplace for winemakers | michael@cruzu.com
There are plenty of startups that get into legal trouble. DraftKings, Theranos, etc. Uber has had, what, hundreds of legal battles and routinely pays 7 digit fines.

The difference with Zenefits is that it got busted doing something fraudulent that was stupid and unethical and plainly illegal. And they did it in an industry with powerful competitive forces.
You might not like how Uber flaunts local regulations but at least they do it out in the open and in courts.
Irwin Stein

Very experienced (40 years) corporate,securities and real estate attorney.
Zenifits was operating in regulated industries where companies spend millions on compliance. The idea that start-ups can flaunt the law is just wrong. Uber, DraftKings and the others mentioned have teams of lawyers. Start-ups that don’t get good legal advice are foolish. Nothing like putting your guts into your new venture and have the authorities close it down just as it starts making money. .
Juan Ramon Zarco

Juan Ramon Zarco Entrepreneur
President, COO at AllRest Technologies LLC
Actually, Zenefits had already various insurance compliance rules that were totally ignored. In the case of Uber, Youtube, AirBnB and others the regulatory landscape had not been that clear. For example, to sell insurance or securities, one needs a license…no different from driving a car. Yes, you can drive a car without a license, until you get caught. That is what happened to Zenefits. It might also be pure ignorance, hubris or sheer idiocy found in SIicon Valley. Rather than even showing effort to comply with the law, Zenefits ignored it at its peril and its CEO got canned. The impact is on the investors whose valuations wil go down becasue fo the many state regulatory lawsuits and the expenditures reserved for product development and marketing is redirected to lawyers and penalties. Think about it: when you pay a parking fine or speeding ticket, are you happy about it? Neither are the investors.
Greg Welch

Greg Welch Entrepreneur
Founder, President & CEO at SquishClip
The question I have is did the Board know, did Investor’s know? Did some of the largest Venture Firms on the planet not know, look the other way, ignore this, or just not care?

I appreciate and agree with all the comments above but was this just the case of a rogue, arrogant or misguided CEO or is the mentality in the Valley, “to become a unicorn at any and all costs”?
Just a question I would love to hear from the group on.
Irwin Stein
Very experienced (40 years) corporate,securities and real estate attorney.
How could they not know? The company was selling insurance which requires a license. The Board is obligated to know. If you don’t understand teh company’s business, what are you doing on the Board? Did the VC funds do no investigation or due diligence before they put down their money? Unlikely? In most cases like this they shopped for a lawyer who would give them the answer that they wanted, because he thought he was too clever to give the answer that 99% of other lawyers would give.
Juan Ramon Zarco
Juan Ramon Zarco Entrepreneur
President, COO at AllRest Technologies LLC
This is a chronic problem in Silicon Valley, but not Wall Street. SV VCs have considerable excess capital to spend on flimsy executions. They only hire the lawyers they know with term sheet expertise, and don’t go beyond that. Whereas a Goldman Sachs hire a team for complete due diligence. That is the difference between SV and NYC.

Whose fault is it? No different from Yahoo: the Board appoint the executives and suffer the consequences from bad judgments. If this were a publicly traded company, shareholders would sue both, and with good reasons.
Irwin Stein
Very experienced (40 years) corporate,securities and real estate attorney.
Mr. Zarco: I have represented VC funds that conduct significant due diligence. There are many good lawyers in SV.. Yes there are many stupid people in Silicon Valley and on Wall street as well. Any lawyer who looked a term sheet for Zenifits, saw that they were not licensed to sell insurance and recommended an investment committed malpractice. If any VC fund doesn’t actually investigate companies into which they invest, I have a bridge to sell them.
Michael Brill
Michael Brill Entrepreneur
Building the first global direct marketplace for winemakers | michael@cruzu.com
It’s not arrogance or too much money or stupid people. It’s simply that a 1,000+ person company is too big to take the same shortcuts that help startups achieve rapid growth. Many, many startups take shortcuts: you scrape sites in violation of TOS or ignore local regulations because you’re under the radar. If you get busted, maybe you get a cease & desist or a stern look by a regulator. A “my bad” usually suffices. This is part of what makes scrappy startups execute so much better than incumbents.

It’s entirely conceivable that the board didn’t know about Macro because it wasn’t considered material… just a productivity hack. The failure is that the transition from scrappy startup to significant entity didn’t bring with it additional controls – controls that would probably be viewed as friction by almost any industry outsider.
It’s hard to shift from “move fast and break the rules” to “dot i’s and cross t’s.” It slows down growth and it’s no fun. If there’s any failure on the board’s part (and it’s a extremely smart board), it’s that it took this long to get a chief compliance officer.
Joanan Hernandez
Joanan Hernandez Entrepreneur
CEO & Founder at Mollejuo
To further Michael’s post. Macro (the software tool which mas making all this mess), simply wasn’t forcing brokers to do their licensing process correctly. Specifically, the tool didn’t force people to do their 52 hours to become a licensed insurance broker.

It’s quite an small detail with big repercussions. It appears that this feature of not forcing the required time, was an intentional one, contrary to a bug. How many people knew about it, remains the question. More importantly, what did Zenefits (or its associates) gained from saving this time? I don’t know!
Was it really worth it to take that risk?
Obviously not.
Cheers!
Posted in Business | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

100% financing is back

It took a while, but it seems one of the products often blamed for contributing to the housing collapse is back.

A California-based credit union has announced the release of its 100% financing mortgage product.

“We were seeing too many people interested in home loans, who were qualified in every way, and either didn’t have enough money saved up, had to tap into their retirement accounts, or needed to borrow from a family member for the 20% down payment required for a conventional mortgage loan,” San Francisco Credit Union said on its website.

It said the product was launched in response to sky-high rent rates.

“It’s not that people can’t afford to make a house payment (look at the amount of rent that’s being paid!), it was the lack of funds or access to the size of down payment that is typically required. We wanted to find a solution to this growing problem and help our community,” the credit union said.

The loans, which are being branded as POPPYLOANs, are available to anyone working in San Francisco or San Mateo County and the home must be in one of the nine Bay Area Counties.

Loans are available up to $2,000,000 and private mortgage insurance is not required.

However, the credit union does charge a $1,200 origination fee as well as an additional loan-to-value fee – up to 1%.

“This fee is based on the total loan amount. For example, if your loan amount is $600,000, and your LTV is 94%, then your total Origination Fees would be $1,200 plus 0.75% of the loan amount or $4,500 for a total of $4,200,” it said.

100% financing is still a rarity, but with one credit union hopping on the trend, will more originators embrace them?

Posted in real estate | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Nurses are important for hospitals

Photo: Getty Photo: Getty

There’s a reason why nursing is such a promising field to enter: You can never have too many of them.

A new study reaffirms that principle, finding that hospitals with lower nurse-to-patient ratios have significantly lower mortality rates than those where nurses are spread out over more patients.

The research, which was published in the British Medical Journal, also found that a lower ratio of doctors to patients was associated with a lower chance of patient death. The study examined 137 acute care “trusts,” which are organizations that oversee hospitals in the U.K.

When looking at all of the trusts, the study found a significant association between the number of doctors on staff and patient mortality, but it did not find that the nurse-to-patient ratio had a major impact.

Which hospitals in the U.S. are marking up prices way over their actual costs? Find out who’s doing it–and how…

But when it focused on surveys of nearly 3,000 nurses from 31 of the trusts, the study found a significant correlation between nurse staffing and patient mortality.

Specifically, facilities with ratios of one nurse per six patients or lower had 20 percent lower patient mortality rates than those with 10 or more nurses per patient.

In contrast, the study found that higher numbers of other health care support workers, who have less training than nurses, was associated with higher mortality rates.

That, said the researchers, was evidence that hospitals seeking to cut costs by hiring less experienced substitutes for nurses are doing a disservice to patients.

“We found no evidence that having more support workers is associated with reduced death rates in hospital,” said Peter Griffiths, a health professor at the University of Southampton, and one of the study authors. “Some of our findings suggest the opposite. A policy of replacing registered nurses with support staff may threaten patient safety.”

Looking for Insurance – CLICK HERE

Posted in Insurance | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Is the high-end property boom about to end in this market?

Is the high-end property boom about to end in this market?
The tech sector has helped drive sales of property in San Francisco and the luxury market is becoming a tougher sell according to realtors. Nina Hatvany has been speaking to CNBC with the benefit of a quarter of a century in the Bay Area realty business and says buyers of high-end homes are becoming “more hesitant” due to losses incurred from falling equity markets. Pacific Union realtor Josh McAdam added that the high-end homes that do sell have to be something special, although there is still demand for the lower-end of the 7-figure listings. Fitch recently warned that it estimates that the San Francisco market is 16 per cent overvalued.

Houston market near January-record
Sales of homes in the Houston market were just 2 per cent off the January record as 2016 got underway. Despite the slowdown in the energy sector single-family homes priced between $150,000 and $250,000 saw year-over-year sales increase by nearly 9 percent while total property sales remained unchanged. The Houston Association of Realtors reports that 4,024 single-family homes sold in the month, down 2.1 per cent from a year earlier. The luxury market slowed more though with homes priced above $500,000 declining 9.3 per cent.

Become Woody Allen’s neighbor for $27 million
A Manhattan townhouse next door to Woody Allen is on the market for $27 million. The New York Post says that the current owner, an Arizona investor, bought the home in 2014 for $31 million and was originally asking $33 million for the five-bedroom, 1869-built home. He then dropped the price to $28 million and has now cut a further million. The home is 19 feet wide, which is a foot narrower than a standard townhouse in the area.

Consumer sentiment is lower this month
The Index of Consumer Sentiment is set to reveal that Americans are slightly less confident in the economy. Estimates from the University of Michigan suggest a drop to 90.7, down from 93.3 in January and below analysts’ expectations. Although there are positive signs for the US economy, including strong retail and labor market data, consumers are concerned that low inflation will subdue growth and wages. That said, low inflation is also cited by respondents as having a positive influence on their personal finances due to the lower cost of living.

Posted in real estate | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

They now want to go after your retirement!

President Obama with Sen. Elizabeth Warren and DOL Secretary Thomas Perez (photo: AP)
President Obama with Sen. Elizabeth Warren and DOL Secretary Thomas Perez (photo: AP)

As was foreshadowed in President Obama’s last State of the Union Address, retirement policy gets considerable attention in the White House’s fiscal year 2017 budget, released today.

Familiar initiatives that Congress previously has refused to fund, like a nearly comprehensive mandate that small employers auto-enroll workers in IRAs, again appears in President Obama’s budget, as it has in his seven previous budget proposals.

But this year’s budget also includes new, specific retirement policy initiatives, including the creation of “open” multiple employer plans, a call for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to raise premiums for troubled multiemployer plans while keeping premiums in PBGC’s single-employer plan flat, and $6.5 million in money for pilot state-run 401(k) plans.

The president’s support for “open” multiemployer plans, which would allow more small businesses to form MEPs by removing the “common bond” requirement previously mandated by the Department of Labor, has met with bipartisan backing from lawmakers and seemingly universal support from industry and retirement experts.

Two Republican bills survived the mark-up hearing with 22 Republican votes, and 14 Democratic dissenters. Both bills would give Congress…

Open MEPs allow small businesses with fewer than 100 employees to pool participants and assets with other employers, giving them greater scale, thereby driving fees down.

They also alleviate the regulatory burden on an employer if it were to sponsor a plan on its own. An open MEP has one annual Form 5500 filing and one annual audit, as opposed to each individual employer filing their own papers.

Numerous bi-partisan legislation in both chambers of Congress have called on regulators to make open MEPs more accommodating by removing the common bond requirement, which says employers must share a similar business structure, or be part of the a trade organization, to form a MEP.

Bob Collie, chief research strategist at Russell Investments, suggested “A well-regulated open MEP system may well offer real potential to efficiently expand retirement saving,” according to a blog he posted in the wake of the White House’s release of the budget proposal.

And Lew Minsky, CEO of the Defined Contribution Institutional Investment Association, said “The proposal to enable employers to bring institutional approaches to their employees through participation in MEPs presents a real opportunity to expand access to retirement savings plans without sacrificing adequacy.”

The President’s budget proposal notes that about half of workers in small businesses with fewer than 50 employees have access to a workplace savings plan, and that fewer than 10 percent of workers without access to a plan contribute to an IRA on their own.

But at least one retirement expert, while supportive of open MEPs, doubts their impact on overall participation rates will be consequential.

In a recent Senate Finance Committee hearing on retirement policy, Alicia Munnell, director of Boston College’s Center for Retirement Research, called open MEPs a potentially “useful tool,” but said that policy, along with others offered by a Finance Committee working group, including expanding tax incentives for small businesses that sponsor plans, should not be expected to significantly inspire small employers’ wider adoption of retirement plans.

She was also ambivalent on the trend at the state level to implement mandatory retirement plans, which has the backing of both the White House and the Department of Labor.

Instead, Munnell called for bolder policy at the federal level to mandate IRA enrollment.

The President’s budget does that, of course, as have all of his other budget proposals.

But calls for mandatory IRA enrollment have so far found little traction in Congress.

The President’s auto-IRA proposal would provide employers with 100 or fewer workers a tax credit up $6,000. Under the current SIMPLE IRA structure, employers benefit from a $500 annual credit for up to three years.

The new budget also proposes that employers that already offer a plan and add an automatic enrollment feature would be incentivized with a $1,500 tax credit.

The budget also proposes to require sponsors to offer access to savings plans for part-time workers with 500 hours of service per year for three consecutive years.

It would also allow the long-term unemployed to withdraw up to $50,000 a year for two years from qualified savings accounts without being penalized.

Relative to PBGC premiums, the President’s budget would freeze additional premium increases in the agency’s single-employer insurance plan, but would authorize PBGC to assess $15 billion in new premium increases to the Multiemployer insurance plan.

That would delay the multiemployer program’s impending insolvency, which PBGC predicts by 2024, for another 20 years, according to the budget proposal.

Posted in Business | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

5 Things You Should Know About Seller’s Disclosure

1.  Form to Use
TREC Seller’s Disclosure of Property Condition form is a copy of the statutory minimum information set out in the Texas Property Code. TAR’s Seller’s Disclosure Notice, contains additional provisions to increase the information provided to buyers. The additional information is designed to reduce risk and exposure for sellers and as an information source for buyers.

2. Exemptions to the Obligation
The seller’s disclosure notice statute contains 11 narrow exemptions. The most common of these exemptions apply to: (a) a builder of a new home, (b) a trustee or executor of an estate, and (c) the lender after foreclosing on a property.

Keep in mind, however, even though these types of sellers are not required to provide a disclosure notice, they still must disclose any known material defects. A material defect is a specific issue with a system or component of a residential property that may have a significant, adverse impact on the value of the property, or that poses an unreasonable risk to people.  For example, a lender who knows about a cracked foundation in a property that the lender acquired through foreclosure must disclose the defect to any buyer who purchases the property from the lender. The means of disclosure is not mandated.

3. Duplex
A seller’s disclosure is not required on a Duplex, however, to reduce any potential risk and/or litigation, the owner of a duplex may decide to provide the notice for each side of the duplex. Remember, disclose, disclose, disclose!

4. Lease
The statutory requirement to provide the notice does not apply to any lease transaction, no matter the duration of the lease period.

5. Death
Texas falls closely in line with the majority of states by recognizing that a seller or agent has no duty to disclose deaths that occurred because of natural causes, suicide, or an accident that was unrelated to the condition of the property. Any known murders must be disclosed, as they are considered facts material to a real estate transaction. In addition, the Texas statute also requires disclosure of deaths that were caused by a condition existing on the property, even if the condition was subsequently remedied. This provision was intended to inform buyers about deaths resulting from structural defects or other dangers inherent to a property.

For more questions about REAL ESTATE – visit robertjrussell.com

Posted in real estate | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Zenefits gets new former Paypal Executive

Major news is coming from Zenefits, the HR automation company based on a disruptive technology that has spawned anxiety and lawsuits from the payroll and benefits industry.

On Monday, CEO and co-founder Parker Conrad resigned amidst much speculation as to the cause.

In his place, former PayPal executive David Sacks steps in.

Sacks, in an email to Zenefits employees, suggested that the company had had some problems with compliance.

Is Zenefits the ultimate broker threat?

Benefits technology startup Zenefits, and its CEO Parker Conrad, is threatening to change the landscape of the employee benefits business…

“The fact is that many of our internal processes, controls, and actions around compliance have been inadequate, and some decisions have just been plain wrong,” wrote Sacks. “As a result, Parker has resigned.”

Sacks emphasized that the company must not seek to downplay wrongdoing, but to acknowledge it and pledge to do better. One of the measures the new CEO highlighted was the appointment of a former federal prosecutor, Josh Stein, as Chief Compliance Officer.

“Josh is already in communication with regulators to advise and update them of our compliance issues,” Sacks wrote.

He added, “Our culture and tone have been inappropriate for a highly regulated company. Zenefits’ company values were forged at a time when the emphasis was on discovering a new market, and the company did that brilliantly. Now we have moved into a new phase of delivering at scale and needing to win the trust of customers, regulators, and other stakeholders.”

Not only will Zenefits adapt its processes to be in line with the law, wrote Sacks, but the company must change its tone. Sacks is referring ostensibly to the “new kid on the block” boisterousness that the startup brought to its confrontations with competitors, particularly during a legal battle with Automatic Data Processing Inc.

Despite the apparent concession from corporate leadership that Parker had made serious mistakes, the former CEO was nevertheless quoted in a company press release announcing his successor.

“David is a strong leader who will take Zenefits to the next stage of development, as it evolvesfrom a startup to a large-scale national leader,” he said. “I am immensely proud of theorganization we have built and the industry-wide impact we’ve had but recognize that ourcompany’s management infrastructure and policies haven’t kept pace with our meteoric growth. Elevating a strong management hand with successful experience and impeccable credentials iswithout a doubt in the best interests of the company at this time.”

After rising quickly to an estimated value of $4.5 billion, Zenefits hit a rough patch in November, with revenue falling short of investor expectations.

Today, the company also announced the addition of three well-known investors to its Board of Directors:

  • Antonio Gracias, founder and Managing Partner of Valor Equity Partners
  • Bill McGlashan, founder and Managing Partner of TPG Growth
  • Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal and of Founders Fund
Posted in Business | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

3 Things to consider before a career change

1) The salaries aren’t good enough in my industry: Salary is a huge motivator for most people. This is the reason many people consider a change of career. However, if you enjoy the job you do it might be best to stay in your industry and look to progress your career within it.

2) I’m fed up with my role: Have you come to the conclusion that only a change of career can rejuvenate your work life? Well, this isn’t always the case. It might not be the role that is the issue. Ask yourself: Is it your Manager who’s the issue? Is it the employer who’s the issue? Often a manager or company can make you doubt your role and resent your job. Picture yourself at another company and if you see yourself in a similar role, then it might just be a case of finding a new job in a different company.

3) There really aren’t many opportunities within my industry/role: If you enjoy your job, but you struggle to find any roles within your profession then this can be disheartening. Try to remain positive and be as proactive as possible. There’s no point moving away from a role that you are good at and enjoy. If you’re in a sector that’s on the way out, then it would definitely be worth reconsidering or adapting your skillset to something more future proof.

Posted in Business | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment